No prescription sales. No commercial bias.  — An independent publication. Editorial content funded by affiliated stores. How we work →

Why we exist

Every major GLP-1 content producer sells prescriptions. Hims, Ro, Noom, Calibrate, Found — their content is good. Their incentives are compromised. When every recommendation points toward their product, you can't know which ones you can trust.

We built glp.health because nobody was addressing the post-prescription experience honestly: the muscle loss, the GI management, the reconstitution errors, the supplement confusion. These problems don't have a clean commercial solution — which is exactly why the telehealth content machine ignores them.

Editorial standards

Every article follows these standards:

  • PubMed citations on every claim. No "studies show" without a live DOI link to the primary source.
  • Evidence grading. Strong / Moderate / Preliminary ratings on supplement and protocol content. We call out weak evidence clearly.
  • Medical review. Every guide reviewed by a credentialed clinician. Published, last-updated, and review dates on every page.
  • No commercial influence. Writers are not informed of affiliate arrangements when producing content.

Our affiliated stores

glp.health is operated by the same organization that runs LeanLoss.com and CMPD Health.

Our editorial content is developed independently of these commercial interests. We recommend third-party products when they're the better option. Affiliate arrangements are disclosed on the relevant content pages.

Corrections policy

Errors are disclosed publicly. Mistakes happen — hiding them doesn't. When we get something wrong, we correct it, note the original error, and explain what changed. Inspired by the GiveWell model of radical transparency.

Contact

Editorial questions, corrections, and media inquiries: contact form.